The Association of Plastic Recyclers
  • PVC

    PVC

PREFERRED

Closures without liners, made from polymers with density <1.0 that float in water; specifically PE and PP
Closures plus liners made from polymers with density < 1.0 that float in water (specifically PE & PP closures; PE foam, EVA, TPE liners)
Shrink film safety sleeves of polymers with density < 1.0 that float in water

Floating polymers are most easily separated from PVC in conventional separation systems. Additionally, the PVC process may capture floatable polyethylene and polypropylene to create an ancillary stream of marketable material. Care must be taken when modifying the polyethylene or polypropylene to ensure the modifier does not increase the overall density to the point it sinks. Note that these sinking polymers are not removed in the combined recycling process but instead become a contaminate. Minimizing closure size is advantageous to both processes.

Shrink film safety sleeves that are designed to be completely removed before the package can be opened

Regardless of material, designs that require complete removal by the consumer of the safety sleeve are Preferred, as the material will not be introduced into the recycling stream.

DETRIMENTAL

Closure liners that are composites of aluminum and paper

These materials will contaminate wash water, will contribute to waste disposal costs, or will stick to the saleable closure material or valuable PVC and reduce quality and value of the final products.

Closures and shrink film safety sleeves made of polymers with density >1.0 that sink in water

(specifically PS, silicone, nylon, acetal, thermosets) These materials are heavier than water and sink in the float-sink tank with PVC. They are extremely difficult to separate from the recycled polymer flake, requiring a costly and inexact polymer flake sorter currently not installed in many reclaiming operations.

Also see "Requires Test Results" Section

RENDERS NON-RECYCLABLE

PET

The use of PET closures, safety sleeves or closure liners renders the package non-recyclable per APR. PET sinks and is extremely hard for the recycler to remove, particularly in small pieces. The recycled PVC stream is very intolerant of even minute amounts of PET.

REQUIRES TEST RESULTS

Closures or lidding with metal components

Sortation testing for metal components will result in either a Detrimental or a Renders Non-Recyclable ruling. Metal components cannot be Preferred at this time.

Metal contamination is highly undesirable in recycled PVC. Metals create wear in process machinery, increase operation costs and yield loss, and are a primary source of defects in products made with recycled PVC. MRFs and PVC reclaimers use magnets and metal detectors to keep packages with metal components out of the process stream. Metal components such as closures or lidding that trigger metal detectors will cause the entire plastic item to be removed from the stream and not recycled. At best, sortation testing will classify such an item as Detrimental to Recycling.

BENCHMARK TEST

Shrink film safety sleeves that are NOT designed to be completely removed before the package can be opened

If a shrink film safety sleeve is designed such that pieces of it may not detach from the package when opened, the material must be tested to determine its compatibility with PVC recycling. Specifically, such materials should either float and be separated from the PVC, or if they sink, they must be compatible with PVC. Companies that are considering such sleeves and are unsure of their compatibility with recycling should ask their suppliers to provide APR test results.

No test methods currently exist for PVC. However, PET Package Component Sink/Float Evaluation (PET-S-05) may be adapted substituting PVC for PET.

SCREENING TEST

Closure valves containing silicone (density and floatability will vary)

Check valves in spray dispensers or pumps may be made of silicone as an alternative to metals. While polymers are generally preferable to metals, the composition of a silicone part may cause it to be incompatible with PVC recycling. It should float in the sink/float system. Companies that are considering such components and are unsure of their compatibility with recycling should ask their suppliers to provide APR test results.

No test methods currently exist for PVC. However, PET Package Component Sink/Float Evaluation (PET-S-05) may be adapted substituting PVC for PET.

SCREENING TEST

Closures, dispenser valves, or springs made of metal

Sortation testing for metal components will result in either a Detrimental or a Renders Non-Recyclable ruling. Metal components cannot be Preferred at this time. Metal is difficult to separate from PVC compared to the preferred closure systems (polypropylene and polyethylene) and adds both capital and operating costs to conventional reclamation processes. Even a small amount of metal left in the recycled polymer stream will block extruder screens in remanufacturing. Large metal items attached to PVC packages may cause the package to be directed to the metal or waste stream in the recycling process, causing yield loss. Small metal components such as spray dispenser springs unravel in the recycling process and blind screens, adding significant cost for removal at the end of the process.

BENCHMARK TEST

Get In Touch

Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Soundcloud
Vimeo
Youtube

APR

1776 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006

Contact Us

Please let us know your name.
Invalid Input
Please write a subject for your message.
Please let us know your email address.
Please let us know your message.
Please complete the reCAPTCHA

Subscribe

Invalid Input