The Association of Plastic Recyclers
  • PET

    PET

Innovation in plastics and packaging is necessary to maintain a healthy and competitive industry. To support innovators, the APR has developed a variety of laboratory test method documents that can be used to assess the impact of a plastic design feature or component on recycling. APR test methods combine laboratory practices and measurements developed specifically by and for plastic recyclers with standard ASTM tests. The objective of testing is to determine the impact of a design feature on the processability of a package item as well as the ability of post-consumer resin (PCR) derived from such feedstocks to meet quality specifications for end-use applications. To view APR’s test method definitions, click here.

In addition, APR recommends adherence to the product stewardship considerations outlined in the PET Design Guidance. A longer-term goal at APR may be to include adherence to the product stewardship guidance when evaluating package features that meet the APR Preferred category.

ADDENDUM UPDATE

As of March 22nd, 2024 the APR Design Guidance and Guidance Table for PET have been updated with all of the addendum contents. As of this date, these addendums will no longer be available on our website. All future updates will be made directly into the APR Design Guidance and Guidance Table, eliminating the need for separate addendums.

Design Feature Recyclability Category APR Design for Recyclability
Test Methods
APR Recognized Commercially Available Options Additional Resources
BASE RESIN
Crystalline Melt Point check Preferred if
temp225-255°C as determined by ASTM D3418-15 test method
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
x Non-Recyclable if
temp<225°C or > 255°C, or non-crystallizable
Intrinsic Viscosity check Preferred if
between 0.72- 0.90 dL/g as determined by ASTM D4603 test method
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
x Detrimental if
<0.72 dL/g or > 0.90 dL/g
Why?
Monomer Composition check Preferred if
> 90% PTA or DMT reacted with MEG
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
x Detrimental
< 90% PTA or DMT reacted with MEG
Why?
Blends of PET and other resins designed to enhance properties in the intended first use with unknown residual effects on future uses of the recovered resin. unknown Needs Testing
Untested blends may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-01
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
COLOR
Transparent Clear check Preferred
Transparent Light Green check Preferred
Transparent Light Blue check Preferred
Other Transparent Colors x Detrimental
Why?
Opaque and White x Detrimental
Why?
Black and Dark Colors x Detrimental if
Passes APR SORT-B-01 testing criteria
Why?
document
SORT-B-01
document
External reviews of these technologies
x Non-Recyclable if
Does Not Pass APR SORT-B-01 testing criteria
DIMENSIONS
Large size boundary check Preferred if
≤ 7.5 liters (2 gal.) in volume
x Detrimental if
> 7.5 liters (2 gal.) in volume
Why?
Small size boundary check Preferred if
> 2 in (5 cm.) in any two dimensions
document
Size Sortation
unknown Needs Testing if
≤ 2 in (5 cm) in any two dimensions
Untested size boundary may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-recyclable results
document
SORT-B-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
2D/3D Boundary check Preferred if
Smallest uncompressed packaging dimension ≥ minimum dimensions per APR-RES-SORT-05
document
RES-SORT-05
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing if
Smallest uncompressed packaging dimension < minimum dimensions per APR-RES-SORT-05
Use SORT-B-05 test method to determine if packaging is Preferred or Detrimental
document
RES-SORT-05
SORT-B-05
CLOSURES, CLOSURE LINERS & SAFETY SEALS
Closures, Liners or Safety Seals made of PP, HDPE, LDPE, PE copolymers including TPO’s and EVA, TPE elastomers that float in water after granulation check Preferred if
Density is ≤ 1.0 g/cm3 or floats in water per PET-S-05
document
PET-S-05
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Safety Seals made of any materials that are designed to be removed and discarded before the package can be opened check Preferred
Closures, Liners or Safety Seals that are composites of AL and paper x Detrimental
Why?
PVC x Non-Recyclable
Closures, Liners or Safety Seals made of polymers with density > 1.0 g/cm3 that sink in water after granulation unknown Needs Testing
Untested Closures, Liners or Safety Seals may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-02
Closures with metal components unknown Needs Testing
Untested closures may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
SORT-B-03
document
Metal Sortation
Other Closures, Liners or Safety Seals not Covered in this section unknown Needs Testing
Untested Closures, Liners or Safety Seals may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-02
SPRAY DISPENSERS & PUMPS
Dispensers/Pumps made of PP, HDPE, LDPE, PE copolymers including TPO’s and EVA, TPE elastomers that float in water after granulation check Preferred if
Density is ≤ 1.0 g/cm3 or floats in water per PET-S-05
document
PET-S-05
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Any amount of PVC x Non-Recyclable
Dispensers/Pumps made of polymers with density > 1.0 g/cm3 that sink in water after granulation unknown Needs Testing
Untested Dispensers/Pumps may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-02
Valves containing silicone (density and floatability will vary) unknown Needs Testing
Untested valves may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-S-05
PET-CG-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Valves or springs made of metal unknown Needs Testing
Untested valves/springs may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
SORT-B-03
document
Metal Sortation
LABELS
Surface Area Coverage for Any Labels used on PET Packaging check Preferred if
Surface Area ≤ 55% for Volumes ≤ 550mL
Surface area ≤ 75% for Volumes > 550mL
unknown Needs Testing
Surface Area > 55% for Volumes ≤ 550mL
Surface area > 75% for Volumes > 550mL
Higher Surface Area Coverage may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
SORT-B-01
SORT-B-04
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Film labels intended to float in water check Preferred if
Density is ≤ 1.0 g/cm3 or floats in water per PET-S-05
document
PET-S-05
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Polystyrene check Preferred if
Floats in water per PET-S-05
document
PET-S-05
unknown Needs Testing
Untested Polystyrene may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-02
Contains Metalized Material check Preferred if
Surface Area is < Preferred Surface Area per APR RES-SORT-4
document
RES-SORT-04
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing if
Surface Area is > Preferred Surface Area per APR RES-SORT-4
Use SORT-B-03 test methods to determine if spherical equivalent threshold yields Detrimental or Non-Recyclable results
document
SORT-B-03
Contains Paper Materials x Detrimental
Why?
Contains PVC or PLA in any amount x Non-Recyclable
Film labels that sink in water unknown Needs Testing
Labels that sink in water may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-S-05
PET-CG-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Laminated substrate unknown Needs Testing
Laminated substrates may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-02
ADHESIVES
No Adhesive check Preferred
Adhesives Designed to Wash Cleanly from PET Package unknown Needs Testing
Adhesives may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
PET-CG-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
INKS AND PIGMENTS
Inks for Film Labels Intended to Float in Water check Preferred
Hot Caustic Resistant Inks that meet APR PET-B-02 Criteria
document
PET-B-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing
Untested Inks may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
Inks for Film Labels that Sink in Water check Preferred
Wash off Inks that meets APR PET-B-02 Criteria
document
PET-B-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing
Untested Inks may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
Inks printed directly on PET package check Preferred
Wash off Inks that meets APR PET-B-02 Criteria
document
PET-B-02
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing
Untested Inks may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
Metallic Inks Used on Any Label or Printed on PET packaging check Preferred if
Surface Area is < Preferred Surface Area per APR RES-SORT-4
document
RES-SORT-04
SORT-B-03
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing if
Surface Area is > Preferred Surface Area per APR RES-SORT-4
Use SORT-B-03 test methods to determine if spherical equivalent threshold yields Detrimental or Non-Recyclable results
BARRIER LAYERS, COATINGS & ADDITIVES
Oxygen Scavengers check Preferred if
Meets the criteria given in PET-CG-01 when employing the aging conditions given in PET-P-12
document
PET-S-03
PET-CG-01
PET-P-00
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
unknown Needs Testing
Untested Oxygen Scavengers may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-recyclable results
Optical Brighteners x Detrimental
Why?
Silicon Oxides unknown Needs Testing
Silicon Oxides may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-recyclable results
document
PET-S-03
PET-CG-01
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Toners unknown Needs Testing
Toners may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-recyclable results
document
PET-S-03
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Reheat Additives unknown Needs Testing
Reheat Additives may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-recyclable results
document
PET-S-03
PET-CG-01
APR Design® for Recyclability Recognitions
Other Barrier Materials and Additives unknown Needs Testing
Other Barrier Materials or Additives may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-recyclable results
document
PET-S-03
PET-CG-01
Degradable Additives SEE APR POSITION PAPER document
APR Position Paper
Degradeable Additives
ATTACHMENTS
Clear PET with compatible parameters to Base Resin Preferred Criteria check Preferred
Paper x Detrimental
Why?
Welded, regardless of resin x Detrimental
Why?
RFID x Detrimental
Why?
PS x Detrimental
Why?
PVC or PLA in any amount x Non-Recyclable
Metal, metallized, and metal containing unknown Needs Testing
Untested metals may yield Preferred, Detrimental, or Non-Recyclable results
document
SORT-B-03
document
Metal Sortation
Optical Brighteners
Optical brighteners are not removed from PET in the recycling process and the residual amount can cause unacceptable fluorescence in the next use of the PET resin. The negative impact on the value and quality of the rPET is not detectable until late in the recycling process.
“Composite Attribute Summary Score” –CASS
The CASS is an evaluation of the sorting potential of an item based on its dimensions. The guiding principle is that rigid plastic packaging articles that are more three-dimensional (round, cylindrical, square) will sort more efficiently in today’s MRFs than those which are more two-dimensional (flat). The evaluation applies a weighting factor to each dimension length, then assigns the score based on the summation of the adjusted dimensions. Depending on the CASS, an item may be classified as “Preferred”, or it may need to be tested to determine its actual sorting potential. The CASS is intended to be used with the Evaluation of 2D/3D Sorting Potential of Articlestest method which is under development
Intrinsic Viscosity
When IV of PET resin is low, PET can be brittle and create more fines when the PET is granulated and washed. Also, lower IV causes finished washed PET flake to require longer solid stating times to bring resin up to a targeted IV value required by end users. When IV is higher than stated in guidance, the IV of finished flake may become too high and the resulting high melt viscosity can interfere with molding processes.
monomer composition
A wide variety of polyester copolymers can be made commercially. A common outcome of making copolymers is that the desirable crystallinity associated with PET is substantially reduced, or even eliminated. Such copolymers may become viscous and sticky like an adhesive at temperatures used to dry recycled PET washed flake. The viscous and sticky behavior results in formation of clumps of PET flake. These clumps are highly undesirable because they can block screens in materials handling systems and can adhere to the inside of driers interfering with drier performance.
Other Transparent Colors
Other transparent colors are used for PET bottles containing specialty beverages, supplements, personal care and automotive products. These may be sorted as PET and processed into lower value, dark colored fiber or sheet products.
Opaque and White
The colorants used to make a white PET bottle are not separable from the resin, and mix with clear and all other colors when the rPET pellets are extruded. This results in undesirable colors and a low-value rPET.
Black and Dark Colors
Historically, black colored packaging items have not been detectable as PET with NIR sorting, and therefore virtually all went to the waste stream. Recent innovations in both black colorants and sortation technology have created the possibility of sortable black PET containers. However, markets for black PET containers remain limited as referenced above. Therefore, testing results are limited to Detrimental and Non-recyclable only at this point in time.
Large size boundary
Recycling machinery, particularly automatic sorting equipment, is not large enough to accept items larger than 7.5 liters . Because larger containers jam the systems, most MRFs employ manual sortation before the automatic line to remove the large items. These items are recovered in a stream of bulky rigid containers that are sold and processed as polyethylene since the vast majority of bulky rigid items are comprised of this polymer. Other polymers including PET either negatively affect or are lost by the polyethylene processing.
Closure liners that are composites of AL and Paper
These materials will contaminate wash water, will contribute to waste disposal costs, or will stick to the saleable closure material or valuable PET and reduce quality and value of the final products.
Closures & shrink film safety seals made of polymers with density > 1.0
Polystyrene, silicone, nylon, acetal, and thermoset plastics are plastics that are expected to sink in the float-sink tank with PET and be detrimental to PET recycling. Sinking plastics are not removed from PET, thereby causing contamination in the final product.
Nylon
Nylon barrier layers are not removed in the PET recycling process. The presence of nylon causes discoloration in the PET flake, ultimately reducing the value of the RPET produced. Compensating for the presence of nylon by using additional toners adds cost and potentially other contaminants to the recycling process.
Untested Barrier Materials or Additives
Barriers and additives that have not been tested under APR test protocols are classified as Detrimental due to a lack of data about their impact on the cost, productivity and quality of the PET recycling process.
Untested Additives
Barriers and additives that have not been tested under APR test protocols are classified as Detrimental due to a lack of data about their impact on the cost, productivity and quality of the PET recycling process. Toners, reheat additives and degradable additives are of particular concern to PET reclaimers.
Paper
The PET reclamation process involves a hot caustic wash that removes adhesives and other label components.This process renders paper into a pulp which is very difficult to filter from the liquid, adding significant load to the filtering and water treatment systems.Some of the small individual paper fibers will remain with the PET and carbonize when the material is extruded, causing unacceptable quality degradation.Non-pulping paper labels that resist the caustic wash process sink in the float-sink tank, thereby causing RPET contamination.
Polymers with density > 1.0, except PVC and PLA
The density of PET is 1.38 and so it sinks in water.The reclaimers rely on float-sink systems to separate non-PET materials.Label components that sink with the PET end up in the RPET stream as contaminants. PVC and PLA are unacceptable at any level.
Paper
The PET recycling process involves a hot caustic wash that removes adhesives and other components. This process renders paper into a pulp which is very difficult to filter from the liquid, adding significant load to the filtering and water treatment systems. Some of the small individual paper fibers will remain with the PET and carbonize when the material is extruded, causing unacceptable quality degradation.
Welded, regardless of resin
A certain amount of a welded attachment cannot be separated from the PET in the recycling process.These attachments, even when ground and made of floatable materials, cause RPET contamination and yield loss issues in both cases: when the PET they are attached to causes the ground section containing both polymers to sink, or when the ground section floats.
RFID
Unless they are compatible with PET recycling and are demonstrated not to create any disposal issues based on their material content, the use of RFID’s is discouraged as it limits PET yield, introduces potential contamination, and increases separation costs.
PS
Polystyrene has a density of > 1.0, so it sinks and remains with the PET in float/sink separation systems. It is not compatible with PET and may cause serious processing and end-use problems.
APR Recognized Commercially Available Options
FreshSafe-PET®
APR Recognized Commercially Available Options
HyCat and Ultimate UV390™ HyCat and Ultimate UV390™
APR Recognized Commercially Available Options
ColorMatrix Europe
APR Recognized Commercially Available Options
Flint Group’s Evolution Deinking Primer with EkoCure® XS Inks and with previously Recognized Klockner Pentaplast Pentalabel® SmartCycle™ washable copolyester shrink sleeve labels for PET bottles
Flint Group’s Evolution Varnish with EkoCure® F Inks and UPM Raflatac previously Recognized BOPP pressure sensitive substrates for PET bottles
CE Unbind solvent-based washable ink series, black, white, and blue, for crystallizable copolyester shrink labels for PET bottles
RecShrink
shrink film “FVH2-05” & non-bleeding ink system “IA1-L”
CCL Label’s EcoFloat™ polyolefin shrink sleeve label decorated with caustic-resistant and non-staining ink
Garware Polyester Ltd.’s ECO-REP heat shrinkable film with washable HP Indigo ElectroInk printed on a HP Indigo Press for crystallizable copolyester shrink sleeve labels for PET bottles
Aquantum primer and Sicura inks Printed on Bonset America’s Bonpet Renew™ crystallizable shrink film, made with Eastman Chemical’s Embrace Encore™ resin
Bonpet Renew™ crystallizable shrink film, made with Eastman Chemical’s Embrace Encore™ resin, and printed with Sun Chemical’s SunSpectro® SolvaWash GR washable ink system
Recycle Friendly washable ink system printed on SKC Ecolabel™
Genesis GS™
MultiColor™ washable ink system on Bonset America’s Bonpet Renew™ Shrink Film made from Eastman Chemical’s Embrace Encore™ resin
recycLABEL™ Clear (HSLPE10002) shrink sleeve label with white, yellow, magenta, cyan, and black decoration
Polyphane™ FitSleeve Label with 527 ink system
SKC Ecolabel™ used with MCC DNX53TM inking system
LDPET shrink sleeve labels
PureVue™ White or Clear Recyclable Pressure Sensitive Labels
APR Recognized Commercially Available Options
Golden Manufacturers Pte Limited’s BOPP film pressure sensitive labels with UV wash-off adhesive for FIJI® Water bottles
LD-PSL System
FIJI Water pressure sensitive label
GreenCycle™ 2.4 mil white top-coated BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate (24WCT) with 776S adhesive
GreenCycle™ 2.4 mil white top-coated BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate (024TL) and 1.85 Mil Clear BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate (018CT), both with 776S acrylic emulsion adhesive
GreenCycle™ 2.4 mil white top-coated BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate and 1.85 Mil Clear BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate, both with 776S acrylic emulsion adhesive
2.6 mil white top-coated BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate and 2.0 mil clear top-coated BOPP pressure sensitive label substrate, both with PUREfloat™ emulsion acrylic adhesive
Multi-Color recycLABEL™ Clear (PSPL78411, PSPL78413) and recycLABEL™ White (PSPL78412, PSPL78414)
RecycLABEL® clear #11581 and RecycLABEL® white #11582 pressure sensitive labels made with clear and white BOPP and an acrylic emulsion adhesiveSpear®RC clear #11581 and Spear®RC white #11582
PureVue™ White or Clear Recyclable Pressure Sensitive Labels
RW85C acrylic emulsion adhesive and clear or white BOPP films undecorated labels covering 40% or less of the area of a PET bottle
SunLam™ ADHA100
Undecorated optiFLEX ecoFOCUS PP 200 H Clear TC, optiFLEX ecoFOCUS PP 230 H White TC, with V-52RE adhesive

Get In Touch

Linkedin

Linkedin

Twitter

Twitter

Facebook

Facebook

Soundcloud

Soundcloud

Vimeo

Vimeo

Youtube

Youtube

APR

2050 M Street NW

Washington, DC 20036

Subscribe

Invalid Input